![]() |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tucker has always wanted to play tug with me, bringing me the tug toy but not dropping it for a fetching session. I was schooled in the "don't play tug with your headstrong dog and never let them win" theory, and now I find out that he's been on board with tug all along. Pushing was slower to come about, and still Tucker is not that into it (though major progress is being made).But he loves the game of tug. I'm slowly working with him on "give" so that I can throw the tug, and then "bring it" for him to (obviously) bring it back. He won't always give it but I know he enjoys the game nonetheless.
BTW, having two identical tugs in Tucker's case doesn't amount to a hill of beans. When he has a tug in his possession, that's the only one that exists, no matter what I do. But I always let him win, even if he drops it for something better...he still gets it in the end.. |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think there is an article about teaching the dog to drop the tug toy - is that the duplicate toy method?
I bet over time, once he knows that you are receptive to playing tug with him and he knows that the more he sees you with the toy the more he is going to get to enjoy the game, he will drop the toy more easily, it will be more about you and less about the toy itself. Tucker sounds like my dog, Happy, in many ways, so I really enjoy reading about your experiences with him. With Happy, if he keeps coming at me and pushing the toy into me after I let it go, I know he has a lot of energy to get out and he needs to fight more/rougher for the toy, when he takes it and trots around with it like he is victorious, I know it is a good time to praise him and wind down. Sometimes one really good session of bringing down the "moose" will last him for a week or more, in between he won't want to play with the same intensity, although in the beginning he would want to play hard every time I took him out. If he gets grabby or overexcited in any situation I know he needs some serious tug time. |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
LCK |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here is a question I haven't seen seen asked yet (not that the answer isn't somewhere I haven't looked).
Is there any specific reason push training is done with the dogs meal rather than say some high value treat (like cheese or hot dog pieces alone) that the dog values over their regular diet? It seems like this would take up less space in the treat pouch, mean less pieces falling on the ground, and create a lot more motivation. I am just wondering why the mixed meal, (kibble+hot dog or raw food) over training treats (cheese cubes or hot dog pieces alone)? |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Then I simply add the voice command "out" (or whatev) AS the dog drops a toy. So the dog starts associating the command with what they're already doing - dropping the toy that was in their mouth in order to get #2. And then after you practice this, the command starts working...like magic. Without the struggle. Note that there is another important reason to take this approach, which is that the tug game becomes more about your interaction with your dog (which you control, from one toy to another) instead of being about "the toy". When you just use one toy the game becomes about that toy - and is noticeably less fruitful in terms of relationship-building. |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
OK - and as for the reasons that I can think of:
![]() Thanks for asking, James! |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
I fasted Tucker P for two days (there were some treats during that time, but no real meals). The third day, I filled my pouch with his kibble, cut up food log, cheese cubes, and his glucosamine. Per Sang's suggestion, we worked on heeling. He did really well with that, but when it came time to push, it was lackadaisical, at best. He'd start out at a good clip coming towards me, but wouldn't push. So we've gone back to the beginning, where I just massage his neck while he smells the food in my hand. Then zing.
He also still won't give up the first tug for the second one. There's no amount of enticement that I can offer to get him interested in the one he doesn't have. |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey Drea, did you introduce the heeling after or before you tried pushing? I should have made it more clear that only after he's really putting his energy into pushing should you then channel into heeling. You can sort of consider that as a rule of thumb. Always pushing first to get the energy going, and then channel it into heeling, settling on the box, etc.....
__________________
http://honorthedog.com/ |
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
So I was just about to rush out of the house when I posted my last response, so it was really brief.
I just wanted to also ask if you had ever trained Tucker to heel using other methods. The reason I ask is that if you did work with him on things like heeling using either +R or correction techniques, then asking him to heel before he's totally expressing his energy into the push, will actually send him back into his old training, which will shut him down and make him emotionally "stuck", since +R and coercion based training focus on suppressing the dog's energy. Which is why it's so important to really get that valve open and get his energy going before asking him to do any kind of obedience type work right now. So just focus on keeping the energy moving for now, and only once the energy is REALLY going through things like pushing, then go ahead and get him to heel with you, etc....but if you feel that he's bogging down at all, immediately go back to pushing and getting his energy going. Hope that helps and clears things up a bit
__________________
http://honorthedog.com/ |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
After the fasting, Tucker and I worked on heeling first, then pushing. I'll do it the other way around tomorrow. And that brings me back to my earlier quandary of how to get Tucker pushing again. We were doing so well for a while.
I'll go back and review the first DVD. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|